Version française
Source InternetActu, http://www.internetactu.net/2008/06/20/les-institutions-doivent-construire-des-donnees-reutilisables-pas-des-sites-web/
By Hubert Guillaud, 20/06/08
According to David Robinson (http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com ), Harlan Yu, William Zeller and Ed Felten from Centre policies of information technology at Princeton University, institutions and U.S. administrations should abandon the dream of developing websites and have to focus on building databases of their decisions, their votes, their funding. The data should be made public, interoperable and free for any use by everyone they explain it in their study.
(To download the study: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1138083#PaperDownload )
According to researchers, the private sector knows better how to organize and present information than the public sector. In many cases, particularly in relation to the American public Internet, the private sector has already produced the best achievements to the users. And to refer to GovTracks, developed by Joshua Tauberer, which is expected to present Legislative information in a much better way than its official competitor, Thomas, maintained by the Library of Congress. The Princeton researchers suggest that, once the private sector will have solved the irritating difficulty of extracting data from government web sites, we should see proliferation of web sites allowing people to search, distribute and analyze their data in multiple ways.
Last fall, Jerry Brito of TechLiberation and researcher at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University had also published an article entitled "Hack, and Peer Mash" in which he explained that release of raw data and open and use of structured formats make sites and actions of government agencies more transparent and accountable.
Still, as reported by ArsTechnica that this release idies still cause problems. Jerry Brito recounts the story of a Washington Post journalist who had discovered "delights" on the site of the U.S. Senate, such as an XML file containing the votes of the congress. But the webmaster has removed access on the pretext that senators have the right to present and comment on their votes as they wish. In other words, to allow access to data structured votes expose senators to a stronger public visibility, which they still find it hard to accept.
(Google modified translation)
Recent Comments